For our children
| Published: 18th September 2008 17:52 |
Now Sid has gone and the demolition of the old Eastleigh Fire Station built in 1898 is complete, which was the only example of this unique type of building structure left in Hampshire, I am left thinking to myself, ‘What legacy are we leaving our children in Eastleigh?'
Children need to understand their heritage and local history. Why must we continue to destroy everything that is over a hundred years old in our town?
Sid's stump can be seen on the far right of the picture. What a contrast to this ‘our' local beauty spot which is listed as protected open green space. How different the vista was only last summer!
What next I wonder - is the Town Hall on the council's hit list? Please stop this mindless destruction of Eastleigh!
Words and picture reproduced courtesy of Matthew Myatt
What do you think?
You will need to sign in to post a comment to this article. if you do not have an AboutMyArea account, you can join now for free.
Posts: 47Still, I'm glad people are taking pictures of our trees, flowers and fauna, so the next few generations will know what once covered the planet.
Posts: 26What are the lcoal councillors doing about this?
Posts: 10
Posts: 1
I must congratulate Matthew for his tireless efforts to preserve what is left of this town and the environment.
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 Apr 2008Posts: 5
I can confirm that this is Phase 3 of The Point Dance centre, which you rightly point out will become a new dance studio to add to their existing two other dance facilities that the councils own figures show that are only at 62% capacity.
The sting in the tail for this development is that it is being built on land not owned by the council but the people of Eastleigh, given to then under charter for recreational use. The cost for this extension is £3 million pounds from local taxes, yet independent research on the use of The Point shows that only 7% of SO50 residents use this facility, the bulk of users come from outside the SO50 area and they are not the ones who will be paying for it.
However let us not forget the secret additions to this new dance studio. On the top of the building will be built three, self contained two bedroom flats for exclusive use for tired dancers. However local housing policy states that to avoid these dancers having to pay community charge the flats can only be occupied for 20 weeks out of every year. So for 37 weeks or 7 months they will sit empty. Now given there are over 5000 local people waiting on the councils housing list for basic accommodation in the SO50 this is a clearly a sham.
How a housing officer can look into the eyes of a mother with a small child who has had to leave her home through domestic violence and presents herself to the council for help only to be told that they have to go into a hostel defies believe knowing full well that the council have this empty housing stock.
I leave your readers to express there feelings on the matter.
Posts: 1
Posts: 15
Joined: 18 Apr 2008Posts: 5



























Posts: 5