• Bookmark this page

The Best Guide for the Neston Area

Neston news, reviews and local events in Neston areas including Neston, Parkgate, Willaston, and communities in Neston.

Calendar of
Upcoming Events
Gordale Garden and Home Centre

Business Reviews

"This Optician is very good."
"Great beauty treatments"
"Well done to the staff at the elephant coffee shop"


"You are providing a fantastic vehicle for ordinary folks to have their say, so many thanks! "
- Roger S.

Easy Access

Councils Unite to Tackle Government Over Covid Concerns

Author: Carrie Spacey Published: 13th January 2021 15:21

Cheshire West and Chester Council is one of several local authorities in the North West that have written to the Government this week, expressing their views on current lockdown arrangements, concerns about the impact on schools and the NHS, and progress in the deployment of testing and vaccines.

Louise GittinsCllr Louise Gittins, Cheshire West Leader and member for Little Neston,
is one of those who have supported the letter to the Government.

Throughout the pandemic, Council leaders have been openly critical of the lack of consultation by the government with local authorities before various measures have been deployed.

In the letter, sent to the Secretary of State for Health and the Secretary of State for Housing and Local Government,, by the Leaders of Cheshire East, Cheshire West and Chester, Warrington and Halton Councils, the Police and Crime Commissioner and the Chair of the Local Enterprise Partnership, a number of issues are highlighted. They are critical of some of the ambiguity around, and poor communication of, Covid regulations, and urge the Government to understand that a 'strong and flexible local response' is what is needed to navigate the months ahead until the coronavirus can be contained or defeated entirely.

The letter reads:

"We are writing to you jointly to set out the views of partners across Cheshire on the current lockdown arrangements, concerns about the impact on schools and our NHS, and progress in the deployment of testing and vaccines.

"We support the need for a lockdown. It is the minimum necessary to address the alarming acceleration of the virus that we have seen across our communities, and address the deeply concerning pressures on our hospitals.

"However, the regulations have left too many areas of social and economic interaction subject to uncertainty. Last Spring there was widespread public compliance witha simple and effective message. In contrast this time, the clarity of the "stay at home" message is undermined by ambiguity between regulations and guidelines; making public compliance more difficult to secure, and creating challenges for our enforcement authorities. For example, regulations enable people to exercise far from home, congregate in beauty-spots and public places, and travel for click-and-collect shopping. The more liberal interpretation of lockdown in the current regulations means that many more people are required to work away from home, increasing the risks that their communities will continue to be disproportionately affected. Travel in private and public transport is more significant than in the previous lockdowns. We also have evidence that mask-wearing is not sufficiently enforceable in indoor public places, or in outdoor areas where people are in close proximity.

"We would support additional national measures that tighten these areas further, to be implemented alongside further financial support for businesses and their employees, and the self employed.

"The process for partial closure of schools was chaotic and poorly communicated by government, leaving our school staff, parents and pupils to deal with a terrible conflict between the education of children and the protection of public health. Our teachers and support staff, supported by our council teams, have been nothing short of heroic. But the constantly changing definition of critical workers and vulnerable children, applied inconsistently between schools facing different local circumstances, has again created confusion. We would urge the government to settle on a clear set of guidelines based on medical evidence, which schools can apply flexibly in support of their local circumstances.

"We would also oppose a premature lifting of the lockdown. Cheshire experienced a rapid escalation between tiers during the Christmas period, which created real suffering amongst our local business community. Nothing would be more destabilising to business than more uncertainty about the regulations they will face. We support retaining lockdown until we see a sustained period of reduced infection, the immediate pressures on our hospitals have been resolved, and the vaccine has protected those who are at highest risk of hospital admission and serious illness. We should then exit with a clear strategy in place for recovery and renewal, supported by additional investment in our economy and communities.

"We welcome the extension of asymptomatic testing under local management, and also the recognition by government that this cannot provide a "freedom pass" to breach the lockdown rules. We will deliver testing locally as part of a wider public health response, with tests made available only to those with unavoidable and repeated contact outside their households; including schools, care homes, critical businesses and front-line public services. We urge government to ensure a sufficient supply of lateral flow devises to meet this need, and to ensure councils have the funding required to deliver the programme effectively and safely. We expect this to remain in place long after the lockdown is eased. Public health programmes will need sustained investment, long after the peak of infection is passed.

"Finally, we welcome the progress being made to roll out the vaccine. Councils are playing an important role in support of the local NHS, and we are committed to moving through the priority groups as quickly as possible. More local discretion would enable us to target specific communities, groups and individuals, based on evidence of the local public health benefit. We regret that community-level data is still not available publicly, despite the huge public interest in understanding the role out of the vaccine locally, and the links to our local outbreak plans. We urge you to learn lessons from the role out of local track and trace which has been hampered by excessive command-and-control, and the confusion created by the recent letter sent to some over-80s about the regional vaccine sites. For most of our over-80s, attendance at the Manchester city centre site is not a viable or safe option, and we will need a greater focus on more accessible and community-based sites if progress is to be made rapidly.

"This letter reflects our commitment to play our part in the next stage of response to this terrible virus. A strong and flexible local response is critical to success, and we urge you to respond quickly to the issues we have raised."

The letter is signed by:Councillor Sam Corcoran, Leader of Cheshire East Council; Councillor Louise Gittins, Leader of Cheshire West and Chester Council; Councillor Craig Browne, Deputy Leader of Cheshire East Council; Councillor Russ Bowden, Leader of Warrington Borough Council; Clare Hayward MBE DL, Chair of Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership; Councillor Rob Polhill, Leader of Halton Borough Council and David Keane, Police and Crime Commissioner for Cheshire.

The Government's response is awaited.




Bookmark and Share

Report this article as inappropriate


At 21:58 on 13th January 2021, Steph commented:
They may have not got everything right but thank the lord that Jeremy Corbyn didn’t make it into power, we would be in a complete right mess......
Dave Carter
At 23:39 on 13th January 2021, Dave Carter commented:
Jeremy Corbyn would have been loads better than this lot, he would have listened to people who know stuff, and he wouldn't have tried to bluster his way through things he didn't understand. It's a pretty low bar, but he would definitely have got more things right.

You need to log in before you can do that! It's only a quick registration process to join the AMA network and completely free.

Sign in or join now to post a comment
Find a Local Business Get the CH64 Newsletter!
Back to Top
© Copyright 2005-2021 AboutMyArea

AboutMyArea Privacy Policy

CH64: Neston Home | News | Community | Business Directory | Villages in CH64 | Family Notices | Council & MP Matters | Local Services | Your Photos | Things To Do In Neston | Advertise & Contribute | Best of Neston & CH64 | Who, When, Why? | Neston News Archive | Contact Us
AboutMyArea: Home | Site Map | Contact AboutMyArea | Terms & Conditions | Community Guidelines | Franchise Opportunity | Help

About Cookies